<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Shmuel Fomberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:owner@semuel.co.il">owner@semuel.co.il</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi.<br>
<div class="im">><br>
> Indeed, I would reconsider using any version control system that uses<br>
> MySQL, PostgreSQL or (flying spaghetti monster-god help us all)<br>
> Oracle. The reason is simply that such a system should be lightweight,<br>
> both on runtime and on install/configure-time. Such a system might be<br>
> fast (which is debatable) but to install it on machines would be extra<br>
> work I won't be looking forward to. :)<br>
><br>
</div>That is because you think now in git terms.<br>
Perforce isn't meant to be installed on develop machine, but on central<br>
system.<br>
the user just get a very thin client that talks with the server.<br></blockquote><div><br>True. Both in the case of "this wouldn't be such a problem when talking about centralized system" and in the case of "you're used to decentralized".<br>
<br>I should have quantified my response as in "I wouldn't use such a system if it was meant to be distributed".<br><br>Shlomi, please be revised. :)<br></div></div></div>