[Israel.pm] catching segmentation faults and other crashes
migo at homemail.com
Mon Nov 12 04:26:29 PST 2007
On 12 Nov 2007 14:14:28 +0200, Yona Shlomo wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > Of course, if Shlomo just wanted to detect abnormal exit and not "core
> > dump", then checking for non-zero $? should be portable enough.
> Yes. This is my fallback -- but can't I get false positives this wat?
If your program does exit(0) on success, then just check for non-zero $?
to catch a failure. If the program may exit with something else and you
don't want to consider it a failure, check for non-zero "$? & 127" to
catch abnormal exit (like "kill -9" or other signal or "Out of memory").
This should be portable enough.
perl -e 'print+chr(64+hex)for+split//,d9b815c07f9b8d1e'
More information about the Perl